Spectacles of the future — Part 3

The making and re-making.

Finding a balance between what can be and what should be

To spark the questions around larger conversations regarding energy efficiency and carbon neutralization, we set about to create some tangible artifacts from the near future. We spoke to the people on the streets to understand their opinions and thoughts from the future and what are their fears regarding the same. We were fascinated by the co-evolution of humans and technology, how technology is changing and how it is changing people. However, we found it very difficult to depict that In form of a physical object. As designers, we were so used to thinking out of the box ideas and narrating that in the form of a story that then it came to dropping that idea on a table as a physical object — I felt stuck, lost, and confused. We were persistent in thinking how technology would work and how it would function so we blindsided the “what” — What is the object? What purpose will it solve? What conversation will it spark? Learning — don’t overthink ideas — if they are good enough to spark a conversation that means it has some potential.

The tangible qualities of these sketches helped us draw attention and spur the imaginations of many, as expressed by the motto “Always bring something to drop on the table.” (attributed to David Kelley).

In my last blog — Spectacle of the future — Part2, I mentioned the approach we followed — Research through Design. In this article, I will show how it actually went.

First round of artifacts created by the team

As we started our exploration with creating artefacts that ranged technology, policy, education, or scenarios. We speculated about our concepts and asked ourselves:

what do you do with this technology?

Will this run by itself ? Does this require a lot of explanation?

What type of conversation will this initiate?

Ban, Amplify, Create

Moodboard for preferable future

We created a moodboard that depicted our preferable future. This was a combination of technology, behaviours, community etc. The exercise begins with the following questions

What will we have to Ban to reach the preferable future on the moodboard?What has to be amplified?What needs to be created?

Banning was quite easy as it went with fossil fuels and all the appliances that currently use them.

Amplifying was mostly about community energy storage, climate educations, and awareness

Create — this was a tough spot as making is not as easy as thinking.

Round 2 — artifacts created from the moodboard.

Learning Outcome

We created a bunch of objects that cohesively talked about our preferable future. However, we did not integrate them with the existing system and also, we showed a lot of details. The purpose of the object is to spark a conversation and not to explain how things will work out.

Education is the incubator of the future

“What if all the coal stations shut by 2025”

From the above object, we were proposing that universities of southwark should provide citizens integrated courses that teach practical skills and educate people about best environmental practices.

This can help people in this transition phase of seeking new jobs, and an opportunity for people to upskill themselves in ways that can lead to environmental conscious decisions in the future. This is also an opportunity for younger students to gain skills that will be valued a lot in the recruitment processes in future.


“ Yes, all universities should address Climate change through their programs”

And some critical ones, “the scenario is true but there are no coal mines in the city”

“too many supporting objects is not conveying the purpose”

Without wasting time we went back to our white board for a quick iteration. We asked ourselves some simple questions:

How does a certificate make any difference?

Whom are we targeting?

Is education the only way to address climate change ?

How do we make it more provocative and relevant to the context of Southwark?

Artifact round 2

“What if all Construction and Energy professionals were mandated to take up-skilling training for the inclusion of the best sustainable practices in their jobs?”

In the second round we changed the narrative a little. We kept our focus on education but we selected our target audience. We asked ourselves:

What if Re-skilling becomes more fit for a purpose?

What if a new ‘power’ emerges?

During a feedback session, one of our tutors mentioned a scenario where she wanted to change her bathroom into fully electrical, but the technician had no skills to do that and hence she had to settle for whatever he knew. We derives our next concept right from this story. This provocation came from learning about the new technologies and infrastructures being introduced to lower carbon emissions in buildings and apartments. We found that despite all these advancements in this field, not many professionals are trained for these technical jobs. Our concept responds to this provocation by pushing these professionals to upskill themselves so they are updated with the latest technologies to help lower carbon emissions.

Round 3 — Artifacts created post testing

With the increasing number of choices available in the market, people get confused and heavily fallback on the technicians’ advice, and this “green license” will help the consumers to increase their trust and consider the suggestions made by the workers. For this to happen, there is a need for technicians, and other skilled professionals to update their knowledge and understand the new ways, to not only suggest sustainable approaches but actually execute them. The second prototype helped us articulate thoughts better. We figured a rising need and gave it s purpose.


Keeping it Simple



No commitment

In the end, our Design Fiction is a way to talk about a near future. It is not a specification, nor is it an aspiration or prediction. The work encouraged conversations about the kinds of near futures we’d prefer, even if that required us to represent near futures we fear.




Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store